Skip to content

Publishers Protest Google Library Project

May 24, 2005

This reminds me of the battles being fought between studios and the developers of peer-to-peer software. Technology marches on and the old guard of media is slow to catch up and then when they do it results in lawsuits flying everywhere. Personally, I’m all for having every bit of available information at ones fingertips for free. I think it’s a great idea. I love the bands that produce and record all their own music and then post in on the internet for public consumption. I love the folks who shoot their own movies and do much of the same thing. This is all in the spirit of punk-D.I.Y. (do it yourself) that defined an entire generation and redefined the meaning of talent. Of course I am a bit biased, being a blogger after all. However, my own personal stake in this aside, a society with unlimited access to information is a society that can stave itself from utter destruction in my opinion. I think it is absolutely necessarry for a project like the one Google is putting together and I hope to see more in the future. It kind of reminds me of how the old Catholic religious order would control people and the meaning of Christianity by limiting access to the Holy Bible before the invention of the printing press. Once the average Joe could read the thing for himself, people could readily challenge what it was the local religious authorities were saying.

Here’s the story:

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) – A group of academic publishers is challenging Google Inc. (GOOG)’s plan to scan millions of library books into its Internet search engine index, highlighting fears that the ambitious project will violate copyrights and stifle future sales.

In a letter scheduled to be delivered to Google Monday, the Association of American University Presses described the online search engine’s library project as a troubling financial threat to its membership – 125 nonprofit publishers of academic journals and scholarly books.

The plan “appears to involve systematic infringement of copyright on a massive scale,” wrote Peter Givler, the executive director for the New York-based trade group.

The association asked Google to respond to a list of 16 questions seeking more information about how the company plans to protect copyrights.

Two unnamed publishers already asked Google to withhold its copyrighted material from the scanners, but the company hasn’t complied with the requests, Givler wrote.

Google, based in Mountain View, Calif., did not immediately return phone and e-mail messages left Monday.

The association of nonprofit publishers is upset because Google has indicated it will scan copyright-protected books from three university libraries – Harvard, Michigan and Stanford.

Those three universities also operate publishing arms represented by the group complaining about Google’s 5-month-old “Libraries for Print” project. That means the chances of the association suing Google are “extremely remote,” Givler said in an interview Monday.

Still, Givler said the association is very worried about Google’s scanning project.

“The more we talked about it with our lawyers, the more questions bubbled up,” he said. “And so far Google hasn’t provided us with any good answers.”

Google also is scanning books stored in the New York Public Library and Oxford in England, but those two libraries so far are only providing Google with “public domain” works – material no longer protected by copyrights.

Federal law considers the free distribution of some copyrighted material to be permissible “fair use.” The company has told the nonprofit publishers that its library program meets this criteria.

Some for-profit publishers also are taking a closer look at Google’s library-scanning project.

“We are exploring issues and opportunities with Google, including the potential impact of this program on our authors, our customers and our business,” said John Wiley & Sons Inc. spokeswoman Susan Spilka.

Copyright concerns aren’t the only issue casting a cloud over Google’s library-scanning project. The project also has drawn criticism in Europe for placing too much emphasis on material from the United States.

One of Google’s most popular features – a section that compiles news stories posted on thousands of Web sites – already has triggered claims of copyright infringement. Agence France-Presse, a French news agency, is suing for damages of at least $17.5 million, alleging “Google News” is illegally capitalizing on its copyrighted material.

The latest complaints about Google are being driven by university-backed publishers who fear there will be little reason to buy their books if Google succeeds in its effort to create a virtual reading room.

The university presses depend on books sales and other licensing agreements for most of their revenue, making copyright protections essential to their survival.

Google has turned its search engine into a moneymaking machine, generating a $369 million profit during the first three months of this year alone. The company is counting on its library scanning project to attract even more visitors to its site so it can display more ads and potentially boost its earnings even more.

Investors already adore Google. The company’s shares surged $13.84, or 5.7 percent, to close Monday at $255.45 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Earlier in the session, the shares traded as high as $258.10 – a new peak since the company went public nine months ago at $85.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.